|
|
Post by nito74 on Jan 25, 2023 18:45:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Armorguy on Jan 25, 2023 18:48:46 GMT
No more Dragon for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbo on Jan 25, 2023 19:48:12 GMT
Can't remember last time I done a Dragon kit, got one in the loft a pz III
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul B on Jan 26, 2023 5:35:46 GMT
Nice, but no thanks  |
|
|
|
Post by jabbly on Jan 26, 2023 5:58:57 GMT
Yep same here. I got fed up with giving money to a company that releases kits that it must know have problems. I sometimes wonder if they even build their own kits before selling them. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul B on Jan 26, 2023 8:50:22 GMT
To be honest I like Dragon kits.
I know there are a few issues with the instructions, but the kits are very accurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by jabbly on Jan 26, 2023 9:18:57 GMT
To be honest I like Dragon kits. I know there are a few issues with the instructions, but the kits are very accurate. Horses for courses and all that!
The one I really liked was the Type 95 Ha-Go. A lovely little kit even if you don't get much plastic for your money. The one that I ended up binning was the Sexton II. There where some minor issues that I'd put into the category of they shouldn't be there but I can live with them. The one that I just thought, no not good enough was fitting the upper and lower hull together. Even with a lot of work I still couldn't get it to sit straight and a bit of googlefoo revealed that it was a really common problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul B on Jan 26, 2023 9:29:31 GMT
To be honest I like Dragon kits. I know there are a few issues with the instructions, but the kits are very accurate. Horses for courses and all that! The one I really liked was the Type 95 Ha-Go. A lovely little kit even if you don't get much plastic for your money. The one that I ended up binning was the Sexton II. There where some minor issues that I'd put into the category of they shouldn't be there but I can live with them. The one that I just thought, no not good enough was fitting the upper and lower hull together. Even with a lot of work I still couldn't get it to sit straight and a bit of googlefoo revealed that it was a really common problem.
I was going mention that kit, as it was talked about. It is also one I then avoided  |
|
|
|
Post by jabbly on Jan 26, 2023 11:58:38 GMT
Horses for courses and all that! The one I really liked was the Type 95 Ha-Go. A lovely little kit even if you don't get much plastic for your money. The one that I ended up binning was the Sexton II. There where some minor issues that I'd put into the category of they shouldn't be there but I can live with them. The one that I just thought, no not good enough was fitting the upper and lower hull together. Even with a lot of work I still couldn't get it to sit straight and a bit of googlefoo revealed that it was a really common problem.
I was going mention that kit, as it was talked about. It is also one I then avoided  It’s strange really as when I got back into modelling Dragon where considered a ‘aspirational’ brand but over the years they’ve managed to really not build on what they had. |
|
|
|
Post by dukemaddog on Jan 27, 2023 20:27:38 GMT
I have always loved their 1/72 scale line, except for the metal hulled models which I never built. All their earliest models in my scale were sensational with no real issues. I built nearly their entire line of 1/72 scale models because of that. Not that any of that is important in a thread about Dragon 1/35th scale models.....  |
|
|
|
Post by Paul B on Jan 27, 2023 21:39:16 GMT
I have always loved their 1/72 scale line, except for the metal hulled models which I never built. All their earliest models in my scale were sensational with no real issues. I built nearly their entire line of 1/72 scale models because of that. Not that any of that is important in a thread about Dragon 1/35th scale models..... Duke, the scale doesn't matter. It's important to know how these kits go together, in all scales and genres. Thanks for letting us know that the plastic 1/72 kits are good  |
|
